The back cover of the book boasts the quote from Dallas Morning News, "Whichever side you sit on regarding Biblical inerrancy, this is a rewarding read." I suspect this claim will not hold true for many readers. For the Biblical inerrantist, the book may likely prove very enlightening, shedding light on many questions about the formation and evolution of the Bible. For anyone who already accepts the errancy of the Bible, the book is full of interesting information which may prove useful in conversation. The problem I have with Misquoting Jesus, however, is not in its content, but in its style. To be blunt, it is a very dry read in some places, and I often found myself struggling to maintain my concentration. This is not to say the book is badly written, it just has an almost textbook quality to it which can make it a bit difficult to digest more than a few sections at a time.
Amongst the topics Ehrman tackels are the history of the New Testament, the problems with early scholarly tradition, how scholars have tried to determine which readings are the best and most accurate, and specific instances of Biblical contradictions. He points to multiple inconsistencies between the Gospels mostly, as these represent his area of expertise.
Ultimately, I recommend it, but not as a light evening read. If you want to get a feel for Ehrman's approach, I would recommend checking him out in my lectures section.
My day off was full of activities I had not planned!
I slept in till 9:30 - awesome
Went to lunch with Cameron at Panda Kitchen - awesome yummy
We dropped off my cable boxes and modem at comcast - finally
We walked around the mall for a bit - torture since I have no money till Thursday
Watched the 2nd Narnia on TV - still like a 3 hour movie lol
Then I came home, took out the garbage, walked the dog, cleaned the litter box, emptied the dishwasher, and started a load of laundry, and refilled the cats bowls. - all w/i an hour time frame. (How do I get more done in an hour than I do being at home all day doing nothing?)
Then we got to go see a FREE pre-screening of When In Rome. - AWESOME FREE! It was a cute movie, its not due out until January and you could tell that some parts of it didnt flow right together, i got a flier to go to a website to give my opinions on it, maybe tomorrow I'll do that.
So now I'm back home resting, gotta put the laundry in the dryer. Still have the season finale of Mad Men to watch, possibly tonight when i go to bed.
I was at Macy's until 8:45 last night for orientation. I go back Sat and Sun for some training and actual work. UGH i also have a dentist appt tomorrow night to take care of this cavity that is giving me a constant headache.
Oh and my 3 day detox/cleanse thing failed, because the headache would NOT go away I had to drink a soda, and then i said screw it and had some mini chocolate doughnuts for breakfast... ill try it again soon LoL
OH YEAH.
My boss told me yesterday that he was not going to be at work Thurs and Friday, and that I had to BE SURE to be on MY best BEHAVIOR on the phones, because apparently I have been not so nice lately. Well I know that. We all know that. and If i recall, about 2 months ago I ASKED NICELY to NOT be on the phones anymore. I know its PART of my job, but its a part that I cannot handle anymore and I shouldnt have to because I have been in the back longer than ANYONE in the office.
I really think my only option would be to go to work drunk, that way, Im guaranteed to be nice......is it possible? probably not... sigh, I just dont know HOW to be FAKE NICE to people. It's not me. Take it or leave it. I am what I am.
So if you all have any suggestions on how I can change my ways and be polite and nice to totally incompetent fucking retards, please, let me know.
Friskies has complied their newsletter with the findings from everyones cat cams as well as a link to all the photos in the flickr stream, check out the PDF !
|
In absence of listening to that long litany of 'factors' - what my doctor did do was write me a prescription ... for Celexa, an anti-depressant. Not sleeping? Not hungry? Can't concentrate? Crying all the time? Here's a pill.
I was still crying when he handed the piece of paper to me, and even though I knew I wouldn't 'cash the cheque' I took it anyway. When I got into the car with my husband, I told him about the prescription and we looked at each other for a few moments and went ... nahhhhh.
Before I launch into a ditribe about the over prescribing of anti-depressants, especially to women - I preface this by saying, I have nothing against anti-depressants. They help many people, who truly need them and for whom, without them, quality of life would be significantly compromised. There are times when anti-depressants are the 'right' answer, but for me, this is not one of those times.
I asked myself, if I were to pull 100 people off the street who were going through the same things I was, how many of them would be crying in their dr's offices (or the super market, the car, the shower, and bedroom)? I am pretty sure the most of them would be faring about the same. It doesn't mean how I feel is not a problem, it means the problem is situational, and I need to find some ways to change the situations so I can feel better.
Taking a pill whilst everything continues the same way isn't going to make me happier, just numb-er, with the risk of a whole bunch of side effects I really don't need at this point in time; abdominal pain, agitation, anxiety, diarrhea, drowsiness, dry mouth, fatigue, impotence, indigestion, insomnia, loss of appetite, nausea, painful menstruation, respiratory tract infection, sinus or nasal inflammation, sweating, tremor, vomiting etc. Now I'm sorry, I have enough going on, without risking any of those problems!
I feel for my dr, who is a pretty good guy. He did take some aggressive steps around my thyroid disease and heart scare but obviously he can't write me a prescription for:
- job for husband
- money to get out of rising debt
- a personal life assistant to pick up some of my slack
- a cure for my thyroid disease
- a reduction of my work stress
- a fix for an estranged family
- or returning my 16 year old daughter, home, where she belongs
He did what he could do. He wrote a prescription for an antidepressant, advised me to take two weeks off work, let my thyroid medication kick in, sit in the sun, listen to relaxing music, maybe meditate, and breathe. I have followed his advice, other than the antidepressant part, and guess what? I am feeling a bit better. Nothing has changed significantly, but I feel more rested, and almost ready to tackle some more life changes which will support me to better manage what is undoubtedly, a really stressful time.
There is an added bonus for me, in my situation, that has come by not going the antidepressant road. I feel stronger, more capable, more resilient and convinced that I can make choices that will support me to feel better. Choices that don't involve medication and side effects.
Maybe I am ready to feel better after all.
There's a certain je ne sais quoi about dumplings. I'm fascinated by dumplings of all cultures, shapes, and forms. From matzoh balls to pierogi, from momos to gnocchi, they are the perfect comfort food.
The fact that they are usually a hundred percent carbohydrate is completely irrelevant.
I always though gnocchi were made with eggs, so the discovery that they don't have to be came as a pleasant surprise. In fact, some traditionalists say that eggs make for a chewier gnocchi, and that is not good. Three large sweet potatoes in the CSA box, some sturdy sage from the herb pot, and we're all set!
What you need:
2 lbs sweet potatoes, roasted (45 minutes in a 450 degree oven), peeled, mashed well
2/3 cup ricotta cheese (throw it in a fine sieve to allow water to drain out, a couple of hours or so)
1.5 cups or more of all purpose flour
salt and pepper to taste
The idea is to make a dough out of the above, using as little flour as possible. To make that possible, use the firmest variety of sweet potatoes you can find. Roast them in the oven instead of boiling. Dust all surfaces with generous amounts of flour and keep dusting.
Bring a huge pot of water to a boil.
Mix together the mashed sweet potatoes, ricotta, flour, salt and pepper. Don't overwork the dough. All you want is for it to stay together and not stick to your hands. Divide the dough into six pieces (a dough separator/scraper comes in very handy.)
Roll each piece out into a half-inch thick string and cut into gnocchi a bit larger than your thumbnail. Then press a floured fork into the back of the gnocchi to create grooves for sauce. Go here for a technique video.
Cook the gnocchi in batches of three. Simply add them to the boiling water and fish out with a slotted spoon as soon as they start to float. Place in a platter.
At this point, you can spread them on a sheet, freeze, then store the frozen pieces in a ziplock bag. Or you can saute them in a sauce of your choosing. I melted a couple of tbsp of butter, fried ten sage leaves in it and added 2 tbsp of maple syrup, before giving the gnocchi a quick saute. Delicious.
There's a certain je ne sais quoi about dumplings. I'm fascinated by dumplings of all cultures, shapes, and forms. From matzoh balls to pierogi, from momos to gnocchi, they are the perfect comfort food.
The fact that they are usually a hundred percent carbohydrate is completely irrelevant.
I always though gnocchi were made with eggs, so the discovery that they don't have to be came as a pleasant surprise. In fact, some traditionalists say that eggs make for a chewier gnocchi, and that is not good. Three large sweet potatoes in the CSA box, some sturdy sage from the herb pot, and we're all set!
What you need:
2 lbs sweet potatoes, roasted (45 minutes in a 450 degree oven), peeled, mashed well
2/3 cup ricotta cheese (throw it in a fine sieve to allow water to drain out, a couple of hours or so)
1.5 cups or more of all purpose flour
salt and pepper to taste
The idea is to make a dough out of the above, using as little flour as possible. To make that possible, use the firmest variety of sweet potatoes you can find. Roast them in the oven instead of boiling. Dust all surfaces with generous amounts of flour and keep dusting.
Bring a huge pot of water to a boil.
Mix together the mashed sweet potatoes, ricotta, flour, salt and pepper. Don't overwork the dough. All you want is for it to stay together and not stick to your hands. Divide the dough into six pieces (a dough separator/scraper comes in very handy.)
Roll each piece out into a half-inch thick string and cut into gnocchi a bit larger than your thumbnail. Then press a floured fork into the back of the gnocchi to create grooves for sauce. Go here for a technique video.
Cook the gnocchi in batches of three. Simply add them to the boiling water and fish out with a slotted spoon as soon as they start to float. Place in a platter.
At this point, you can spread them on a sheet, freeze, then store the frozen pieces in a ziplock bag. Or you can saute them in a sauce of your choosing. I melted a couple of tbsp of butter, fried ten sage leaves in it and added 2 tbsp of maple syrup, before giving the gnocchi a quick saute. Delicious.
Firstly, Catherine's book (and research) is primarily based on the experiences of 11 women who are all 40-ish or so. The research is Australian and reflects Australian practices around mental health and institutional care of women/mothers who were diagnosed with significant mental health problems. It serves a reflection of the mental health system as seen through the personal narratives of the women who participated in the study.
The book addresses the stigma associated with having a 'mad mother' - and the isolation, shame and fear that these women experienced as children, the impact on their everyday lives - and the ongoing effect it has had on their adult lives, relationships etc. As a collection of stories, the book certainly highlights the resilience of children and families. I felt that the emphasis of a mother having to be institutionalized a bit frustrating. I would have liked the broader inclusion of women who had experienced growing up with 'mad moms' who were not medicated or institutionalized but still left their daughters with a legacy of 'wtf'.
I grew up with the peripheral understanding that my mother was an alcoholic. Many of the situations which were a part of my growing up, I attributed to having a very young (she was 16 when I was born) mother who struggled with addiction. I saw her emotional estrangement and violence in this context and it was not until I was an adult that the story definitely expanded to include a diagnosis of bi-polar depression, which had gone undiagnosed and untreated (as far as I am aware) while I was growing up. As an adult I am aware of my mother's ongoing relationship with mental health professionals, drug therapies and hospitalizations, which include electroshock therapy. I have been peripherally aware of the fact that her mental health issues have prevented her from working, or using the social work degree she earned in her mid 30's. I am also deeply aware of how unhappy she has been most of her life, and the impact that has had upon me, my life choices, my relationships and my parenting.
This is not about blame mommy, as I sometimes felt while I read Catherine's book. For me, the book lacks a clearly articulated social justice framework, and a gendered analysis which may have allowed for more of a compassionate vs sympathetic view of the mothers in this book. And tho I found the stories of the daughters highly compelling, I would have found the book more balanced if the mothers stories, the social construction of mothering and mental health, and the relationship and responsibility of the wider family and community had been considered in more depth.
I imagine the context of the book was to give each of the women an opportunity to be central in their own story. So often when someone in your family is ill, they become the 'star' and everyone else becomes a shadow - hence the book title. However, I believe the possibilities for healing would have been greater, again, if the stories of the mothers and the social construction of mothering and mental health, and the relationship and responsibility of the wider family and community had been more fleshed out.
For instance, a daughter views their mother's crazy behavior in relation to the impact it has on her thoughts, feelings, physical reality - but would that reality change with an appreciation of how the mother was experiencing that same moment? Also, again, would there not be greater capacity to be gentle and generous with our own struggles to maintain relationships and raise children, if we could understand where personal issues begin and end?
It is not the 'fault' of the mothers that they had mental health problems. It is not the fault of the mothers that mental health problems carried/s such social stigma. It is not the fault of the mothers that there were/are very poor supports, services or resources for themselves or their families. It is not the mothers fault that the institutional care provided to them was so very often the best of a worst solution. It is not the fault of the mothers that the fathers and wider family and community were not there to offset and support the mothers or their children. Yes the mental health of their mothers created a legacy of issues for each woman, but locating the responsibility of those issues with the mother, who was ill,and also suffering, seems to me, to grotesquely miss the mark.
We don't talk much about my mother's mental health problems. Actually, we don't talk. Estrangement is part of the legacy of the mental health problems in my family, as is the inability of individual family members to locate themselves in those issues. My mother's mental health problems are one variable in a complex tapestry of family dynamics. What I can say is I see my mothers story in a gendered, social conscious manner - and that allows me compassion - even tho, it does not allow me a relationship.
[Cross posted @ E-Strange]
- 20:13 Omgaaaah they sell ecko purses here! So dangerous! #
Automatically shipped by LoudTwitter